Does anyone remember a while back when I said Donovan McNabb sucks and everyone (Squints) hated on me for it. Well HA!!! What do you think of me now bitches!
Last 2 games: 1 TD, 5 INTs, 2 Fumbles, 47% completion. And he was just benched today for some guy nobody, including his own team has ever heard of. Good call Squints, McNabb is definately 'great'.
And lets not forget these last two games were against Cincinatti and their 9 losses and Baltimore and their banged up secondary.
What do you have to say for yourself Mr. know-it-all sports reporter? Looks like RedDawg isn't so REDiculous after all.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
Brian Westbrook makes the Eagles a different team when he plays. McNabb, over the course of the past 10 seasons, is great. You can't just pick out two games whenever it's convinient for your argument.
And you can't blame the inneffectiveness of McNabb on Westbrook being injured. Here's an idea McNabb, don't throw the ball to the other team and don't drop the ball. That's on him. And McNabb has never been 'great'. Absolutely never.
I would love to see the Vikes pick up McNabb. There is no way he stays in Philly after this. Benching him with the team only down three made no sense.
Was it because he didn't know that games could end in a tie?
actually, you can pick two games when its convenient for you argument, squints. It would cease to be a rediculous assertion without an egreious sample size.
McNabb is somewhere in between sucking and greatness. He has been a solid QB for his entire career, with some very impressive highlights. However, I've never been a big fan of him or his attitude - always wanting the world to feel sorry for him and stuff...
McNabb is a good QB on the downslope of his career. Without Westbrook his game is at a significant disadvantage (just like Tom Brady would be without guys like Randy Moss and Wes Welker, or any other quarterback without his #1 weapon).
To say he is either great or sucks are both REDiculous statements.
He has definately 'sucked' his past 2 or 3 games.
Pirahnas, the Vikings don't need an old Tavaris Jackson. The young one is bad enough.
Five Pro Bowls. How many "non-great" quarterbacks have been to five pro bowls. Riddle me that.
RedDog, I suppose when Mauer goes 0-for-3 some game, you're going to say he isn't a great catcher, too?
2/16 = 1/8
so, if Mauer were to go hitless in 162/8 = 20.25 games, yes, I'd consider him to suck.
And to answer your first question. One.
27-39 (69%) 4 TD, 0 INT
121.7 passer rating
Mauer '08:
0-1 5 times
0-2 5 times
0-3 8 times
0-4 10 times
0-5 3 times
The Riot, I'm talking consecutive games obviously.
its never obvious what the hell you're talking about
what is this the random mathematics blog?
Post a Comment